Per Linde

520 citations
41 papers · 390 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Per Linde

35 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Per Linde
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Human-Computer Interaction 174
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 98
  • Instrumentation 24
  • Museology 24
  • Media Technology 46
Replace Tom McEwan with:
Tom McEwan United Kingdom
Eric Corbett United States
Thomas Reitmaier United Kingdom
Cindy Lin United States
Barbara McManus United Kingdom
Fui-Theng Leow China
Cliff Hooker Australia
Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan Switzerland
Shengdan Cai China
Jihee Kim South Korea
Per Linde relative to Tom McEwan United Kingdom Tom McEwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Tom McEwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Per Linde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Per Linde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Per Linde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Per Linde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Per Linde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Per Linde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Per Linde. The network helps show where Per Linde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Per Linde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Per Linde Line = papers co-authored together Per Linde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011135
2 201541
3
Playful Collaborative Exploration: New Research Practice in Participatory Design
200539
4 201536
5 200631
6 200713
7 199311
8 199311
9 200710
10 20209
11 20128
12 20067
13 20124
14 20164
15 20043
16 20053
17 20142
18
B and V photometry of faint stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud
19882
19 19982
20
Glossary: Collaborative Future-Making
20202

About Per Linde

Per Linde is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (13 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (6 papers), Design Education and Practice (4 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers) and Smart Cities and Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (174 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (98 citations), Instrumentation (24 citations), Museology (24 citations) and Media Technology (46 citations). Per Linde has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Binder, Pelle Ehn, Ina Wagner, Giulio Jacucci, Giorgio De Michelis, Martin Johansson, Dagny Stuedahl, Cristiano Storni, Bo Peterson and Krassimira Paskaleva. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, CoDesign, Astronomy and Astrophysics, interactions and Digital Creativity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact