Michael Strange

33 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Michael Strange
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Development 18
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Sociology and Political Science 129
  • Political Science and International Relations 64
  • Clinical Psychology 46
Replace Victor Chidubem Iwuoha with:
Victor Chidubem Iwuoha Nigeria
Andrew Selee United States
Roy Kwon United States
Kate Williams Australia
Natalia Szablewska Australia
Chikodiri Nwangwu Nigeria
Irina Haivas Romania
Ernest Toochi Aniche Nigeria
Yu-Wen Chen Taiwan
Emma C. Murphy United Kingdom
Michael Strange relative to Victor Chidubem Iwuoha Nigeria Victor Chidubem Iwuoha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Victor Chidubem Iwuoha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Strange

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Strange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Strange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Strange more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Strange

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Strange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Strange. The network helps show where Michael Strange may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Strange, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Strange Line = papers co-authored together Michael Strange links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201065
2 202035
3 201931
4 201722
5 202017
6 201914
7 201613
8 202412
9 201112
10 20228
11 20208
12 20157
13 20166
14
Writing Global Trade Governance: Discourse and the WTO
20136
15 20146
16 20135
17 20155
18 20234
19 20114
20 20154

About Michael Strange

Michael Strange is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Strategy and Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include World Trade Organization Law (6 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Challenges (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (18 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Sociology and Political Science (129 citations), Political Science and International Relations (64 citations) and Clinical Psychology (46 citations). Michael Strange has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Oliveira Martins, Anna Lundberg, Elisabeth Mangrio, Shinjiro Hirose, Jacob Stephenson, Patrick F. Curran, Kullada O. Pichakron, Eric B. Jelin, Ramin Jamshidi and Michael R. Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as Politics, Critical Policy Studies, Development and Change, Policy Design and Practice and Policy & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact