Mitchell Harrop

435 citations
13 papers · 311 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell Harrop

13 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Mitchell Harrop
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Human-Computer Interaction 116
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 52
  • Museology 14
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
  • Media Technology 10
Replace Michele Platner with:
Michele Platner United States
Joseph Fordham United States
Bernard Perron Canada
Charlotte Wiberg Sweden
Aki Järvinen Finland
Sus Lundgren Sweden
Paula Maria Escudeiro Portugal
Leshell Hatley United States
Borja Manero Spain
Paul D. Rudman United Kingdom
Mitchell Harrop relative to Michele Platner United States Michele Platner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Michele Platner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Harrop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Harrop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Harrop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Harrop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Harrop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Harrop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Harrop. The network helps show where Mitchell Harrop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Harrop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell Harrop Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell Harrop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2016103
2 201468
3 201263
4 201429
5 201423
6 20145
7 20155
8 20164
9 20164
10 20143
11 20162
12
Security in open systems
19881
13 20091

About Mitchell Harrop

Mitchell Harrop is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications and Media Technology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (7 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Media and Digital Communication (2 papers), Access Control and Trust (1 paper), Cybernetics and Technology in Society (1 paper), Art, Technology, and Culture (1 paper) and Information and Cyber Security (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (116 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (52 citations), Museology (14 citations), Sociology and Political Science (127 citations) and Media Technology (10 citations). Mitchell Harrop has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Martin Gibbs, Marcus Carter, John Downs, Bjørn Nansen, Niels Wouters, Andrew Vande Moere, Sarah Ellen Webber, Eduardo Araújo de Oliveira, Frank Vetere and Jenny Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Culture, Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, Digital Games Research Association Conference, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks and Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact