P. Keys

27 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

P. Keys
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Management Science and Operations Research 684
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 109
  • Artificial Intelligence 316
  • Management Information Systems 70
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 49
Replace Frederick P. Wheeler with:
Frederick P. Wheeler United Kingdom
Tony Hindle United Kingdom
James R. Emshoff United States
Cynthia Kurtz United States
Melvin F. Shakun United States
Jamshid Gharajedaghi United States
Corina Paraschiv France
Manel Baucells United States
Frans M. van Eijnatten Netherlands
Laura J. Black United States
P. Keys relative to Frederick P. Wheeler United Kingdom Frederick P. Wheeler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Frederick P. Wheeler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Keys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Keys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Keys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Keys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Keys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Keys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Keys. The network helps show where P. Keys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside P. Keys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Keys Line = papers co-authored together P. Keys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984468
2 198960
3 200646
4 199740
5 198939
6 200534
7 200632
8 199830
9 198821
10 200018
11 200210
12 199810
13 198610
14 19856
15 19816
16 20135
17 19825
18 19895
19 19874
20 19854

About P. Keys

P. Keys is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (18 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (12 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (3 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers) and Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (684 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (109 citations), Artificial Intelligence (316 citations), Management Information Systems (70 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (49 citations). P. Keys has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Jackson, Stephen Cropper, Huw C.W.L. Williams, Michael Clarke, John R. Beaumont, Robert L. Flood, Arthur D. Hall, Damian Maher, Peter H. Friesen and Richard M. Burton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Operational Research Society, Omega, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Journal of Educational Change and Public Policy and Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact