Olivia Engmann

2.1k citations
33 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Olivia Engmann

32 papers receiving 995 citations

Peers

Olivia Engmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Biological Psychiatry 139
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 128
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 365
  • Developmental Neuroscience 66
  • Physiology 178
Replace Caroline Dias with:
Caroline Dias United States
Mercè Masana Spain
Alon Shamir Israel
Bagrat Abazyan United States
Kelley C. O’Donnell United States
Yukio Takamatsu Japan
Jürgen Innos Estonia
Anti Kalda Estonia
Charles Finsterwald Switzerland
Thu N. Huynh United States
Olivia Engmann relative to Caroline Dias United States Caroline Dias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Caroline Dias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Olivia Engmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Olivia Engmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olivia Engmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olivia Engmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Olivia Engmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olivia Engmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olivia Engmann. The network helps show where Olivia Engmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Olivia Engmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Olivia Engmann Line = papers co-authored together Olivia Engmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015175
2 200894
3 201190
4 200987
5 201175
6 201750
7 201746
8 201943
9 201140
10 201136
11 202235
12 201531
13 201830
14 201530
15 201024
16 202021
17 202018
18 202010
19 20229
20 20189

About Olivia Engmann

Olivia Engmann is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Biological Psychiatry and Physiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (2 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (139 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (128 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (365 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (66 citations) and Physiology (178 citations). Olivia Engmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Karl-Peter Giese, Eric J. Nestler, Benoît Labonté, Ja Wook Koo, Yong Kim, Angus C. Nairn, Tibor Hortobágyi, Claire Troakes, Paul Greengard and Erin S. Calipari. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Neuropharmacology, Current Zoology, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact