Ning Ding
Impact in
-
- Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
- Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Gut microbiota and health 3
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 3
-
- Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Zhigang Li (9 shared papers)Jing Jiang (9 shared papers)Shoji Yahara (2 shared papers)Toshihiro Nohara (2 shared papers)Ludwig Kappos (2 shared papers)James K. Sheffield (3 shared papers)Krzysztof Selmaj (3 shared papers)Eva Havrdová (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Neuroscience (5 papers)Medicine (3 papers)Fitoterapia (3 papers)Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (3 papers)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Ning Ding
51 papers receiving 951 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Complementary and alternative medicine 166
- Biological Psychiatry 37
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 152
- Neurology 71
- Pharmacology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Ning Ding
This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Ding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Ding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Ding. The network helps show where Ning Ding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ning Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 212 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 14 |
About Ning Ding
Ning Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Physiology and Plant Science, having authored 62 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (7 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (4 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (166 citations), Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (152 citations), Neurology (71 citations) and Pharmacology (85 citations). Ning Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Zhigang Li, Jing Jiang, Shoji Yahara, Toshihiro Nohara, Ludwig Kappos, James K. Sheffield, Krzysztof Selmaj, Eva Havrdová, Xavier Montalbán and Gıancarlo Comı. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Neuroscience, Medicine, Fitoterapia, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.