Frontiers in Neuroscience

13.9k papers and 280.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.9k papers published in Frontiers in Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 280.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Neuroscience usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (5.9k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.8k papers) and Molecular Biology (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (1.9k papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1.7k papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Neuroscience are Michael Pfeiffer, Richard P. Heitz, Gert Pfurtscheller, Tobi Delbrück, Alexander Borst, Jon I. Arellano, Peter Malinowski, B. Linares-Barranco, Arno Klein and Jason A. Tourville.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025