Nathan Hager

637 citations
32 papers · 438 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Hager

29 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Nathan Hager
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 153
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • Clinical Psychology 71
  • Pharmacology 56
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 52
Replace Scott C. Wollman with:
Scott C. Wollman United States
Tam T. Nguyen‐Louie United States
Jonathan Berrebi Sweden
Patrick A. McConnell United States
José Raúl Naranjo Germany
Karolina Kozak Canada
Nancy L. Grugle United States
Philip Lau United States
Saeid Yazdi‐Ravandi Iran
Patricia Pelz Germany
Nathan Hager relative to Scott C. Wollman United States Scott C. Wollman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Scott C. Wollman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Hager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Hager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Hager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Hager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Hager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Hager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Hager. The network helps show where Nathan Hager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Hager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Hager Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Hager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201480
2 201541
3 201634
4 201834
5 201828
6 201728
7 201526
8 202222
9 201620
10 202018
11 201614
12 201712
13 201910
14 20218
15 20217
16 20157
17 20167
18 20197
19 20207
20 20226

About Nathan Hager

Nathan Hager is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (153 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (71 citations), Pharmacology (56 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (52 citations). Nathan Hager has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Teresa R. Franklin, Reagan R. Wetherill, Kanchana Jagannathan, Hengyi Rao, Anna Rose Childress, Matt R. Judah, Barbara Johnson, Joel Mumma, Zhuo Fang and Ze Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychology, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Addiction Biology, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact