Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

271.5k citations
9.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Papers in

    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 1.7k
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 1.6k
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 1.5k
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 1.5k
    • Motor Control and Adaptation 631
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception 587

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

8.8k papers receiving 262.2k citations

Peers

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 153.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43.2k
  • Neurology 20.0k
  • Social Psychology 37.4k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 24.6k
Replace Human Brain Mapping with:
Human Brain Mapping United States
Cortex United States
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews United States
Neuroreport United States
Nature reviews. Neuroscience United States
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience United States
Current Biology United States
Cerebral Cortex United States
Behavioural Brain Research United States
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology United States
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience relative to Human Brain Mapping United States Human Brain Mapping's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Human Brain Mapping · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Human Neuroscience more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

About Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

The 9.6k papers published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 271.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (6.5k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k papers), Neurology (897 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (847 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (877 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1.7k papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1.6k papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1.5k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1.5k papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (703 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (693 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (631 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (587 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are Ali Mazaheri, Ole Jensen, Suzana Herculano‐Houzel, Steven J. Luck, Javier López‐Calderón, Mel Slater, Karl Friston, Christoph S. Herrmann, Keum‐Shik Hong and Thomas D. Parsons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact