Addiction Biology

2.2k papers and 61.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Addiction Biology in the last decades have received a total of 61.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Addiction Biology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k papers), Molecular Biology (579 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (546 papers) specifically the topics of Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1.0k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (412 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (290 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Addiction Biology are Thomas Tzschentke, Harriet de Wit, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Elisabet Jerlhag, Rainer Spanagel, Roger G. Pertwee, Miriam Schneider, Rajita Sinha, Carles Sanchis‐Segura and Priti Gupta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Addiction Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Addiction Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Addiction Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Addiction Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Addiction Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Addiction Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Addiction Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025