Biological Psychology

4.2k papers and 175.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Biological Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 175.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Biological Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (2.4k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k papers) and Social Psychology (718 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1.3k papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (598 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (522 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological Psychology are Stephen W. Porges, Sylvia D. Kreibig, Albert Kok, John Polich, Risto Näätänen, G. Robert J. Hockey, Bruce H. Friedman, John J. B. Allen, Martin Eimer and Margaret M. Bradley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biological Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Biological Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025