Nancy Young

675 citations
13 papers · 278 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Young

11 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Nancy Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Library and Information Sciences 106
  • Information Systems 99
  • Education 96
  • Information Systems and Management 20
  • Safety Research 24
Replace Quinn Galbraith with:
Quinn Galbraith United States
Lisa O’Connor United States
Bárbara Fister United States
Sharon Markless United Kingdom
Chris Bourg United States
Roger Fenton United Kingdom
Stuart Boon United Kingdom
Ralph Catts United Kingdom
Stella Korobili Greece
Susan Gardner Australia
Nancy Young relative to Quinn Galbraith United States Quinn Galbraith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Quinn Galbraith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Young. The network helps show where Nancy Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Young Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200086
2
General Information Seeking in Changing Times: A Focus Group Study.
200147
3 200644
4 200835
5 200332
6 200915
7
Developing an Ethnography-Based Accessibility Survey with and for Disabled Children.
20157
8 20145
9 20003
10
Using MedPAR data as a measure of urinary tract infection rates: implications for the Medicare inpatient DRG payment system.
20053
11 20241
12 20210
13 20110

About Nancy Young

Nancy Young is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Education, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (7 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (4 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (106 citations), Information Systems (99 citations), Education (96 citations), Information Systems and Management (20 citations) and Safety Research (24 citations). Nancy Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Maria A. Jankowska, Steven Jones, Nance Lucas, Jan Arminio, Angela Scott, Helen Scott, Sean Doherty, Susan Ruddick, Nicole Yantzi and Susan J. Zahner. Their work appears in journals such as Reference Services Review, Journal of Library Administration, portal Libraries and the Academy, Journal of Dental Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact