Journal of Library Administration

13.0k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Research Data Management Practices

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 644
    • Library Science and Administration 373
    • Web and Library Services 469
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 359
    • Library Science and Information Systems 103
    • Research Data Management Practices 66

Journal of Library Administration

1.4k papers receiving 9.3k citations

Peers

Journal of Library Administration
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Library and Information Sciences 5.4k
  • Information Systems 6.1k
  • Conservation 601
  • Information Systems and Management 1.1k
  • Communication 1.1k
Replace Library Review with:
Library Review United Kingdom
Library Management United Kingdom
The Library Quarterly United States
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science United Kingdom
Library trends United States
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science United States
Library philosophy and practice United States
Reference Services Review United States
The Electronic Library United States
Serials Review United States
Journal of Library Administration relative to Library Review United Kingdom Library Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Library Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Library Administration

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Library Administration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Library Administration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Library Administration more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Library Administration

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Library Administration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Library Administration.

About Journal of Library Administration

The 2.0k papers published in Journal of Library Administration in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Library Administration usually cover Library and Information Sciences (767 papers), Information Systems (859 papers), Conservation (118 papers), Communication (114 papers) and Computer Science Applications (65 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (644 papers), Web and Library Services (469 papers), Library Science and Administration (373 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (359 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (115 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (103 papers), Online and Blended Learning (96 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Library Administration are Jane Robbins, Margaret K. Merga, Joan Giesecke, P. Bryan Heidorn, Kate Manuel, Russell Michalak, Joan K. Lippincott, Kenning Arlitsch, Donald E. Riggs and Maureen Sullivan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact