Reference Services Review

15.9k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1973

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Science and Information
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Information Science and Libraries

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 833
    • Library Science and Administration 160
    • Web and Library Services 299
    • Library Science and Information 265
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 84
    • Information Science and Libraries 24
    • Library Science and Information Systems 15

Reference Services Review

1.1k papers receiving 13.1k citations

Peers

Reference Services Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Library and Information Sciences 8.9k
  • Information Systems 5.4k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 119
  • History and Philosophy of Science 647
  • Computer Science Applications 218
Replace The Library Quarterly with:
The Library Quarterly United States
Library trends United States
Serials Review United States
Aslib Journal of Information Management United Kingdom
Library & Information Science Research United States
Journal of Documentation United Kingdom
IFLA Journal United States
portal Libraries and the Academy United States
Journal of Library Administration United States
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science United Kingdom
Reference Services Review relative to The Library Quarterly United States The Library Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×59.5×
The Library Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Reference Services Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reference Services Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reference Services Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reference Services Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Reference Services Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reference Services Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reference Services Review.

About Reference Services Review

The 1.3k papers published in Reference Services Review in the last decades have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Reference Services Review usually cover Library and Information Sciences (916 papers), Information Systems (514 papers), Conservation (14 papers), Computer Science Applications (13 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (9 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (833 papers), Web and Library Services (299 papers), Library Science and Information (265 papers), Library Science and Administration (160 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (84 papers), Information Science and Libraries (24 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (15 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reference Services Review are Lorrie A. Knight, Anna Marie Johnson, Hannelore B. Rader, Jim Hahn, Alexius Smith Macklin, Joan K. Lippincott, Lili Luo, Christine Susan Bruce, Patricia A Iannuzzi and Diane Mizrachi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact