N. Penney

964 citations
26 papers · 816 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Meat and Animal Product Quality 18
    • Animal Nutrition and Physiology 3
    • Food Safety and Hygiene 7
    • Probiotics and Fermented Foods 4
    • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 2

N. Penney

26 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers

N. Penney
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Animal Science and Zoology 548
  • Biotechnology 211
  • Food Science 425
  • Biomedical Engineering 174
  • Small Animals 26
Replace K. G. Newton with:
K. G. Newton Australia
D. L. Huffman United States
J.G. van Logtestijn Netherlands
W.R. Usborne Canada
M.O. Hanna United States
E.W. Mills United States
M J Buyck United States
G.L. Nortjé South Africa
DL Fletcher United States
D.M. Broda New Zealand
N. Penney relative to K. G. Newton Australia K. G. Newton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
K. G. Newton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. Penney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Penney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Penney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Penney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Penney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Penney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Penney. The network helps show where N. Penney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside N. Penney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. Penney Line = papers co-authored together N. Penney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994124
2 1988104
3 197781
4 199347
5 198636
6 198535
7 197435
8 199033
9 197833
10 199231
11 197631
12 199527
13 197926
14 199626
15 199419
16 199619
17 199318
18 198418
19 198217
20 199314

About N. Penney

N. Penney is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 26 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (18 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (2 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (548 citations), Biotechnology (211 citations), Food Science (425 citations), Biomedical Engineering (174 citations) and Small Animals (26 citations). N. Penney has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include C.O. Gill, Robert G. Bell, John Hudson, S.J. Mott, P. M. Nottingham, S.M. Moorhead, J. Harrison, Tracey L. Cummings, L.E. Jeremiah and N.G. Leet. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research and Food Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact