M.L. Williams

36 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

M.L. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Toxicology 79
  • Clinical Psychology 197
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 90
  • Molecular Medicine 21
Replace Alejandra Gallardo‐Godoy with:
Alejandra Gallardo‐Godoy United States
William J. Hornback United States
Tohru Kishi Japan
Michael A. Eissenstat United States
Noreen Naiman United States
Charles F. Barfknecht United States
Seán D. McDermott Ireland
Jackson B. Hester United States
Panpan Wang China
Eugene R. Baizman United States
M.L. Williams relative to Alejandra Gallardo‐Godoy United States Alejandra Gallardo‐Godoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Alejandra Gallardo‐Godoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.L. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.L. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.L. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.L. Williams. The network helps show where M.L. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.L. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.L. Williams Line = papers co-authored together M.L. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014111
2 201447
3 202042
4 202137
5 198936
6 197433
7 202030
8 201428
9 202026
10 201920
11 202115
12 201614
13 201913
14 199612
15 19978
16 20188
17 20187
18 20226
19 20156
20 20176

About M.L. Williams

M.L. Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology, Organic Chemistry, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (13 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (7 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (79 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (90 citations) and Molecular Medicine (21 citations). M.L. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Will Lawn, Monica J. Barratt, Adam Winstock, A. J. Horne, Jill E. Gready, Paul Liknaitzky, M.J. Scanlon, Biswaranjan Mohanty, Claire J. Foldi and Brian J. Oldfield. Their work appears in journals such as ChemMedChem, General Hospital Psychiatry, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact