Daniel Perkins

42 papers receiving 837 citations

Peers

Daniel Perkins
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Clinical Psychology 679
  • Biological Psychiatry 71
  • Toxicology 37
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 194
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 152
Replace Paulo César Ribeiro Barbosa with:
Paulo César Ribeiro Barbosa Brazil
Adèle Lafrance Canada
Josep María Fábregas Spain
Fire Erowid United States
Earth Erowid United States
Malin V. Uthaug Netherlands
Sabela Fondevila Spain
Luís Fernando Tófoli Brazil
Henrik Jungaberle Germany
Nadia R. P. W. Hutten Netherlands
Daniel Perkins relative to Paulo César Ribeiro Barbosa Brazil Paulo César Ribeiro Barbosa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Paulo César Ribeiro Barbosa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Perkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Perkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Perkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Perkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Perkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Perkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Perkins. The network helps show where Daniel Perkins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Perkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Perkins Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Perkins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022127
2 2021109
3 202082
4 202272
5 202152
6 202148
7 202140
8 202137
9 202231
10
Beyond Neo-liberalism: The Social Investment State?
200426
11 200724
12 202123
13 202323
14 202022
15 202315
16 201014
17 202314
18 202114
19
Improving Employment Retention and Advancement of Low-paid Workers
200812
20 202312

About Daniel Perkins

Daniel Perkins is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 48 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (32 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (15 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (679 citations), Biological Psychiatry (71 citations), Toxicology (37 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (194 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (152 citations). Daniel Perkins has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jerome Sarris, Nicole Leite Galvão‐Coelho, Violeta Schubert, José Carlos Bouso, Luís Fernando Tófoli, Emérita Sátiro Opaleye, Justin Sinclair, Wolfgang Marx, Michael de Manincor and Simon Ruffell. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Drug and Alcohol Review and Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact