Daniel Perkins

39 papers receiving 800 citations

Peers

Daniel Perkins
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Clinical Psychology 644
  • Biological Psychiatry 69
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 187
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 148
  • Toxicology 32
Replace Kim van Oorsouw with:
Kim van Oorsouw Netherlands
Paulo César Ribeiro Barbosa Brazil
Adèle Lafrance Canada
Malin V. Uthaug Netherlands
Rafael Lancelotta United States
Fire Erowid United States
Earth Erowid United States
Josep María Fábregas Spain
Lisa Evans United States
Luís Fernando Tófoli Brazil
Daniel Perkins relative to Kim van Oorsouw Netherlands Kim van Oorsouw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kim van Oorsouw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Perkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Perkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Perkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Perkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Perkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Perkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Perkins. The network helps show where Daniel Perkins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Perkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Perkins Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Perkins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022125
2 2021109
3 202076
4 202268
5 202150
6 202148
7 202137
8 202136
9 202231
10
Beyond Neo-liberalism: The Social Investment State?
200424
11 202123
12 202323
13 202021
14 200720
15 202114
16 201013
17 202313
18
Improving Employment Retention and Advancement of Low-paid Workers
200812
19 202312
20 202310

About Daniel Perkins

Daniel Perkins is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 45 papers that have together received 847 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (30 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (14 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (10 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (9 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (644 citations), Biological Psychiatry (69 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (187 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (148 citations) and Toxicology (32 citations). Daniel Perkins has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jerome Sarris, Nicole Leite Galvão‐Coelho, Violeta Schubert, Luís Fernando Tófoli, José Carlos Bouso, Emérita Sátiro Opaleye, Justin Sinclair, Wolfgang Marx, Michael de Manincor and Broc A. Pagni. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Current Opinion in Psychiatry and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact