Neil Thomas

6.9k citations
133 papers · 3.9k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Neil Thomas

126 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Neil Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Applied Psychology 522
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 621
  • Philosophy 443
Replace Wim Veling with:
Wim Veling Netherlands
Clara Strauss United Kingdom
M. Zachary Rosenthal United States
Torsten Norlander Sweden
Thomas D. Meyer United States
Cynthia Price United States
Ivan Figueira Brazil
Vaughan Bell United Kingdom
Ferenc Köteles Hungary
Julian Rubel Germany
Neil Thomas relative to Wim Veling Netherlands Wim Veling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Wim Veling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Thomas. The network helps show where Neil Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Neil Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012216
2 2014167
3 2019154
4 2014152
5 2017124
6 2017122
7 2017103
8 2005102
9 201194
10 201490
11 201788
12 201685
13 202180
14 201378
15 201572
16 201870
17 201968
18 201864
19 201262
20 201560

About Neil Thomas

Neil Thomas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 133 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (35 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (24 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (19 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (18 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (12 papers), Hallucinations in medical conditions (12 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (12 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (522 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (621 citations) and Philosophy (443 citations). Neil Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan L. Rossell, Simon McCarthy‐Jones, John Farhall, Clara Strauss, Mark Hayward, Fiona Foley, Michelle H. Lim, David Copolov, Imogen Bell and Wei Lin Toh. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact