General Hospital Psychiatry

3.6k papers and 112.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in General Hospital Psychiatry in the last decades have received a total of 112.8k indexed citations. Papers published in General Hospital Psychiatry usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.4k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k papers) and Social Psychology (638 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (550 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (429 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (369 papers). The most active scholars publishing in General Hospital Psychiatry are Jon Kabat‐Zinn, Wayne Katon, Kurt Kroenke, Michael E. Thase, Bernd Löwe, Janet B. W. Williams, Robert L. Spitzer, Leonard E. Egede, Herbert C. Schulberg and Joan Russo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in General Hospital Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in General Hospital Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in General Hospital Psychiatry.

Countries where authors publish in General Hospital Psychiatry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in General Hospital Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in General Hospital Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Hospital Psychiatry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025