Stephen Bright
Impact in
- Toxicology top 2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 17
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 10
- Co-authors
- Monica J. Barratt (5 shared papers)Gagik G. Melikyan (2 shared papers)Kenneth I. Hardcastle (2 shared papers)Ali Marsh (4 shared papers)Brian Bishop (3 shared papers)Robert Kane (3 shared papers)Petra Skeffington (4 shared papers)Matthew Allen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (12 papers)Addiction Research & Theory (4 papers)Journal of Humanistic Psychology (3 papers)Drug and Alcohol Review (2 papers)Australasian Journal on Ageing (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Stephen Bright
45 papers receiving 509 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Toxicology 76
- Clinical Psychology 197
- Organic Chemistry 138
- Applied Psychology 20
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 64
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bright
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bright. The network helps show where Stephen Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 9 |
About Stephen Bright
Stephen Bright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Organic Chemistry, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (17 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (10 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (76 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations), Organic Chemistry (138 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (64 citations). Stephen Bright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Monica J. Barratt, Gagik G. Melikyan, Kenneth I. Hardcastle, Ali Marsh, Brian Bishop, Robert Kane, Petra Skeffington, Matthew Allen, Cylie Williams and Leigh M. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Addiction Research & Theory, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Drug and Alcohol Review and Australasian Journal on Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.