Mitchell A. Medow

14 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

Mitchell A. Medow
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Health Information Management 77
  • Health Informatics 22
  • General Decision Sciences 31
  • Family Practice 20
  • Safety Research 52
Replace Yalini Senathirajah with:
Yalini Senathirajah United States
Guido Gatti United States
Markus A. Feufel Germany
Curtis L. Cole United States
Martina A. Clarke United States
Erwin Loh Australia
Thomas Ploug Denmark
Maia Jacobs United States
Sameer Malhotra United States
Jacob Solomon United States
Mitchell A. Medow relative to Yalini Senathirajah United States Yalini Senathirajah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Yalini Senathirajah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell A. Medow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell A. Medow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell A. Medow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell A. Medow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell A. Medow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell A. Medow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell A. Medow. The network helps show where Mitchell A. Medow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell A. Medow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell A. Medow Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell A. Medow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2004143
2 201288
3 200778
4 201146
5 200642
6 200225
7
Internal medical residents' ability to diagnose and characterize major depression.
199920
8 200811
9
Cognitive debiasing through sparklines in clinical data displays.
200710
10 20019
11 20108
12
Investigating Resuscitation Code Assignment in the Intensive Care Unit using Structured and Unstructured Data.
20102
13 20011
14 20081

About Mitchell A. Medow

Mitchell A. Medow is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Family Practice, Otorhinolaryngology and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Radiology practices and education (1 paper), Machine Learning in Healthcare (1 paper) and Topic Modeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (77 citations), Health Informatics (22 citations), General Decision Sciences (31 citations), Family Practice (20 citations) and Safety Research (52 citations). Mitchell A. Medow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belarus and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Schweikhart, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Victoria A. Shaffer, Hal R. Arkes, Catherine R. Lucey, Edgar C. Merkle, Kelly J. Kelleher, David E. Schuller, Harrison G. Weed and Deena J. Chisolm. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Decision Making, Journal of General Internal Medicine, International Journal of Medical Informatics, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy and Evidence-Based Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact