Otorhinolaryngology

192.6k papers and 3.4M indexed citations i.

About

192.6k papers covering Otorhinolaryngology have received a total of 3.4M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Head and Neck Cancer Studies, Sinusitis and nasal conditions and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media and also cover the fields of Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. Some of the most active scholars covering Otorhinolaryngology are Maura L. Gillison, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Stephen T. Sonis, David W. Kennedy, Neil Bhattacharyya, C. René Leemans, William H. Westra, Jatin P. Shah, Arlene A. Forastiere and Itzhak Brook.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Otorhinolaryngology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Otorhinolaryngology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Otorhinolaryngology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Otorhinolaryngology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Otorhinolaryngology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Otorhinolaryngology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otorhinolaryngology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025