Countries where authors publish in Evidence-Based Medicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence-Based Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-Based Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine.
About Evidence-Based Medicine
The 633 papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine usually cover Family Practice (23 papers), Medical Terminology (2 papers), Internal Medicine (22 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (49 papers) and General Health Professions (140 papers) specifically the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (71 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (49 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (39 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (36 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (28 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (25 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (22 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence-Based Medicine are M. Hassan Murad, Mouaz Alsawas, Fares Alahdab, Noor Asi, David L. Sackett, R. Brian Haynes, Zhen Wang, Gordon Guyatt, Rod Jackson and Jonathan J Deeks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.