Ming Singer

753 citations
32 papers · 570 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Singer

31 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Ming Singer
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 186
  • Information Systems and Management 119
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Gender Studies 97
  • Safety Research 65
Replace Judith L. Nye with:
Judith L. Nye United States
Wesley C. King United States
William C. Gaidis United States
Beverly A. Browne United States
Mary C. Kern United States
Patrick A. Knight United States
Charles E. Naquin United States
Thomas L. Ruble United States
Thomas L. Keon United States
Holly A. Schroth United States
Ming Singer relative to Judith L. Nye United States Judith L. Nye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Judith L. Nye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Singer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Singer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Singer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Singer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Singer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Singer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Singer. The network helps show where Ming Singer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ming Singer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Singer Line = papers co-authored together Ming Singer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998107
2 199169
3 199067
4 198546
5 199142
6 198537
7 198923
8 198522
9 199121
10 198518
11 199413
12 199611
13 199011
14
Gender differences in leadership aspirations.
198910
15 19909
16 19908
17 19918
18 19857
19 19866
20 20015

About Ming Singer

Ming Singer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (3 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (186 citations), Information Systems and Management (119 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Gender Studies (97 citations) and Safety Research (65 citations). Ming Singer has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan E. Singer, Sarah Mitchell, Julie W. Turner, Barrie Stacey, Joseph G. Rosse, Steven Lysonski, David Hayes, Jerry M. Calton and Alexander Mackenzie. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, The Journal of Psychology, International Journal of Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact