The Journal of Social Psychology

6.0k papers and 95.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.0k papers published in The Journal of Social Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 95.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Social Psychology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (2.3k papers), Social Psychology (2.1k papers) and Clinical Psychology (793 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (1.2k papers), Cultural Differences and Values (676 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (357 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Social Psychology are John J. Ray, David W. Johnson, Luo Lu, Ken Rigby, Roger T. Johnson, Phillip T. Slee, Linda Steg, Judith I. M. de Groot, Adrian Furnham and Jin Nam Choi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Social Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Social Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Social Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Social Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Social Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025