Mie Nishimura

40 papers receiving 831 citations

Peers

Mie Nishimura
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Biochemistry 87
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 87
  • Food Science 202
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 147
Replace Chun‐Kuang Shih with:
Chun‐Kuang Shih Taiwan
Linjing Zhao China
Vahid Maleki Iran
Chin‐Kun Wang Taiwan
Moon Ho South Korea
Si-Xia Wu China
Francesca Truzzi Italy
Yanjun Zhang China
Daniel Hinojosa-Nogueira Spain
Hui‐Fang Chiu Taiwan
Mie Nishimura relative to Chun‐Kuang Shih Taiwan Chun‐Kuang Shih's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Chun‐Kuang Shih · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mie Nishimura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mie Nishimura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mie Nishimura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mie Nishimura more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mie Nishimura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mie Nishimura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mie Nishimura. The network helps show where Mie Nishimura may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mie Nishimura, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mie Nishimura Line = papers co-authored together Mie Nishimura links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201475
2 201564
3 201664
4 197161
5 201557
6 201953
7 201746
8 201446
9 201440
10 201036
11 201533
12 202132
13 201531
14 201828
15 201921
16 201618
17 201716
18 202115
19 201415
20 201913

About Mie Nishimura

Mie Nishimura is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Physiology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (4 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (3 papers), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (3 papers) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Biochemistry (87 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (87 citations), Food Science (202 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (147 citations). Mie Nishimura has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jun Nishihira, Tatsuya Ohkawara, Jun Nishihira, Masuko Kobori, Aiko Tanaka, Yuji Sato, Hiroshi Takeda, Hiroji Sato, Richard B. Weiskopf and John W. Severinghaus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, Nutrients, Journal of Functional Foods, Food & Function and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact