Michael Spedding
Impact in
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Biological Psychiatry top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 81
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 29
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 17
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 64
- Ion channel regulation and function 36
- Co-authors
- Anthony J. Harmar (18 shared papers)William A. Catterall (6 shared papers)Florian Hofmann (1 shared paper)D. R. Abernethy (1 shared paper)George A. Gutman (1 shared paper)K. George Chandy (1 shared paper)David E. Clapham (1 shared paper)Stephen Alexander (25 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Pharmacology (58 papers)Pharmacological Reviews (14 papers)Neuropharmacology (13 papers)Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (12 papers)European Journal of Pharmacology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Spedding
256 papers receiving 27.1k citations
Michael Spedding's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 8.2k
- Biological Psychiatry 941
- Behavioral Neuroscience 869
- Physiology 1.2k
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Spedding
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Spedding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Spedding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Spedding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Spedding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Spedding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Spedding. The network helps show where Michael Spedding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Spedding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 260 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | International Union of Pharmacology: Approaches to the Nomenclature of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 6329 |
| 2 | The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2018: updates and expansion to encompass the new guide to IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 1566 |
| 3 | Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 1014 |
| 4 | The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 993 |
| 5 | Functional Selectivity and Classical Concepts of Quantitative Pharmacology Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 950 |
| 6 | The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY: an expert-driven knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 802 |
| 7 | Anti-inflammatory actions of steroids: molecular mechanisms Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 630 |
| 8 | 2006 | 532 | |
| 9 | The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G Protein‐Coupled Receptors Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 529 |
| 10 | 2003 | 512 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 469 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 451 | |
| 13 | Promoting the clearance of neurotoxic proteins in neurodegenerative disorders of ageing Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 442 |
| 14 | Altering the course of schizophrenia: progress and perspectives Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 424 |
| 15 | 2013 | 414 | |
| 16 | THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: Introduction and Other Protein Targets Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 406 |
| 17 | 2013 | 368 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 276 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 273 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 269 |
About Michael Spedding
Michael Spedding is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Physiology, having authored 260 papers that have together received 28.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (81 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (64 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (36 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (29 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (18 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (17 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (17 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (8.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (941 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (869 citations), Physiology (1.2k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.3k citations). Michael Spedding has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony J. Harmar, William A. Catterall, Florian Hofmann, D. R. Abernethy, George A. Gutman, K. George Chandy, David E. Clapham, Stephen Alexander, Adam J Pawson and Joanna L Sharman. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Pharmacological Reviews, Neuropharmacology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and European Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.