Edward Rosser
Impact in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Cancer-related gene regulation
Papers in
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 2
- Co-authors
- Richard R. Neubig (1 shared paper)Tom I. Bonner (2 shared papers)Anthony P. Davenport (2 shared papers)Anthony J. Harmar (1 shared paper)Michael Spedding (1 shared paper)Jean‐Philippe Pin (1 shared paper)Steven M. Foord (1 shared paper)Alison N. Hulme (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Molecular Informatics (1 paper)Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (1 paper)Pharmacological Reviews (1 paper)Organic Letters (1 paper)Journal of Cheminformatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Edward Rosser
8 papers receiving 504 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 176
- Molecular Biology 354
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 24
- Chemical Health and Safety 2
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 48
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Rosser
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Rosser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Rosser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Rosser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Rosser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Rosser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Rosser. The network helps show where Edward Rosser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Edward Rosser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 415 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 |
About Edward Rosser
Edward Rosser is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Toxicology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Small Animals, having authored 8 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (1 paper), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (176 citations), Molecular Biology (354 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (24 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (2 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (48 citations). Edward Rosser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard R. Neubig, Tom I. Bonner, Anthony P. Davenport, Anthony J. Harmar, Michael Spedding, Jean‐Philippe Pin, Steven M. Foord, Alison N. Hulme, Jonathan D. Vessey and Simon Morton. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Informatics, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Pharmacological Reviews, Organic Letters and Journal of Cheminformatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.