Michael O’Neill

3.1k citations
91 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Michael O’Neill

70 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Biological Psychiatry 79
  • Neurology 187
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 364
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 30
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 74
Replace Ming Guo with:
Ming Guo China
James E. Porter United States
Christopher Clark United States
David C. Perry United States
Eun‐Mee Kim South Korea
Marsha Wilcox United States
William R. Woodward United States
Yu Nakamura Japan
Tzung‐Jeng Hwang Taiwan
Jennifer L. Short Australia
Michael O’Neill relative to Ming Guo China Ming Guo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Ming Guo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Neill. The network helps show where Michael O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014199
2 201296
3 201486
4 200678
5 199478
6 200772
7 200456
8 200351
9
Nonprofit Management Education: U.S. and World Perspectives
199843
10 200442
11 201140
12 199938
13
AMPA receptor potentiators as cognitive enhancers.
200738
14 200835
15 199934
16 200529
17 199428
18 199325
19 201623
20 200223

About Michael O’Neill

Michael O’Neill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Education and Neurology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (7 papers), Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (79 citations), Neurology (187 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (364 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (30 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (74 citations). Michael O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Witkin, Michelle M. Robertson, Tracey K. Murray, Michael Hutton, Sophie Dix, Samuel J. Jackson, Sarah Glover, George Perry, Rachel Angers and Xiongwei Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, Brain Research, Romanticism, Practical Radiation Oncology and Brontë Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact