Michael O’Neill

78 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Biological Psychiatry 80
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 76
  • Neurology 174
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 355
  • Physiology 370
Replace James E. Porter with:
James E. Porter United States
Christopher Clark United States
Katherine Bryant United Kingdom
Yan Fan China
Christina Rabe Germany
Eun‐Mee Kim South Korea
N. Maritza Dowling United States
Andrew Lees United Kingdom
Christophe Morin France
Hye‐Ryeon Lee United States
Michael O’Neill relative to James E. Porter United States James E. Porter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
James E. Porter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Neill. The network helps show where Michael O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014205
2 2012101
3 201494
4 200687
5 199480
6 200777
7 200459
8 200357
9
Nonprofit Management Education: U.S. and World Perspectives
199846
10 200444
11 199744
12 201141
13
AMPA receptor potentiators as cognitive enhancers.
200740
14 199939
15 200836
16 199934
17 200231
18 199430
19 200529
20 199327

About Michael O’Neill

Michael O’Neill is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 113 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Irish and British Studies (8 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (7 papers), Education Systems and Policy (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (80 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (76 citations), Neurology (174 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (355 citations) and Physiology (370 citations). Michael O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Witkin, Michelle M. Robertson, Tracey K. Murray, Michael Hutton, Sophie Dix, Zachary Leader, Suchira Bose, Michel Goedert, Benjamin Falcon and Samuel J. Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, Brain Research, Romanticism, Practical Radiation Oncology and Brontë Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact