Stephen N. Mitchell

1.1k citations
27 papers · 756 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen N. Mitchell

25 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers

Stephen N. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 64
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 477
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 206
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 33
  • Developmental Neuroscience 35
Replace S.N. Mitchell with:
S.N. Mitchell United Kingdom
Ning Wu Czechia
Florence Loiseau France
Karla Drescher Germany
Manolo Mugnaini Italy
Olivier Bergis France
Maddalena Mereu Italy
R. H. Perry United Kingdom
Irina Belozertseva Russia
Naheed Mirza Denmark
Stephen N. Mitchell relative to S.N. Mitchell United Kingdom S.N. Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S.N. Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen N. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen N. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen N. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen N. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen N. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen N. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen N. Mitchell. The network helps show where Stephen N. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen N. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen N. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Stephen N. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200678
2 198963
3 199159
4 199356
5 200655
6 199452
7 200447
8 201540
9 199439
10 201337
11 200036
12 200434
13 200125
14 199724
15 201119
16 199017
17 199015
18 201712
19 19919
20 20089

About Stephen N. Mitchell

Stephen N. Mitchell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Neurology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (64 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (477 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (206 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (33 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (35 citations). Stephen N. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey A. Gray, Michael H. Joseph, Trevor Sharp, Mark D. Tricklebank, Katherine Smith, L J Boothman, M.P. Brazell, Helen Hodges, Jane Cooper and Steven Williams. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Neuropharmacology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Psychopharmacology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact