Stephen N. Mitchell

1.1k citations
27 papers · 824 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen N. Mitchell

26 papers receiving 774 citations

Peers

Stephen N. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 521
  • Biological Psychiatry 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 221
  • Developmental Neuroscience 39
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 32
Replace Ning Wu with:
Ning Wu Czechia
S.N. Mitchell United Kingdom
Florence Loiseau France
Rodolfo Silveira Uruguay
Harry W. Broening United States
Magdalena Zaniewska Poland
Rossella Dall’Olio Italy
Robert H. Perry United Kingdom
Alexander Kuzmin Sweden
Tomohiro Abekawa Japan
Stephen N. Mitchell relative to Ning Wu Czechia Ning Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ning Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen N. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen N. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen N. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen N. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen N. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen N. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen N. Mitchell. The network helps show where Stephen N. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen N. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen N. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Stephen N. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200686
2 199167
3 198966
4 200661
5 199458
6 199357
7 200449
8 199444
9 201541
10 201740
11 201338
12 200436
13 200036
14 200127
15 201119
16 199016
17 199015
18 201715
19 200411
20 20089

About Stephen N. Mitchell

Stephen N. Mitchell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (15 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (7 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (521 citations), Biological Psychiatry (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (221 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations). Stephen N. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey A. Gray, Michael H. Joseph, Trevor Sharp, Mark David Tricklebank, Katherine Smith, Laura J. Boothman, Helen Hodges, Michael P. Brazell, Jane Cooper and Steven Bruce Williams. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Neuropharmacology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Psychopharmacology and The FASEB Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact