Michael Lamb

477 citations
28 papers · 283 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 6
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 3
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 4
    • Values and Moral Education 3

Michael Lamb

25 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Michael Lamb
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Information Systems and Management 40
  • Architecture 7
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Education 101
  • Communication 18
Replace Jeffrey L. Buller with:
Jeffrey L. Buller United States
Philip Sirinides United States
Teresa A. Wasonga United States
Olivia M. Little United States
Jennifer R. Keup United States
Annemarieke Hoekstra Canada
Wouter Schenke Netherlands
William Allan Kritsonis
Frauke Meyer New Zealand
Denise Beutel Australia
Michael Lamb relative to Jeffrey L. Buller United States Jeffrey L. Buller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jeffrey L. Buller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lamb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lamb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lamb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lamb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lamb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lamb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lamb. The network helps show where Michael Lamb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lamb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lamb Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lamb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201941
2 199837
3 202129
4 201928
5 201922
6 202021
7 201620
8 201218
9 20189
10 20118
11 20238
12 20226
13 20185
14 20175
15 20155
16 20233
17
Determining the need for a refresher course. Report of a study.
19903
18 20243
19 20242
20 20242

About Michael Lamb

Michael Lamb is a scholar working on Philosophy, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augustinian Studies and Theology (6 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), Values and Moral Education (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (40 citations), Architecture (7 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Education (101 citations) and Communication (18 citations). Michael Lamb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Edward Brooks, Alan Renwick, Olga Pierrakos, Eranda Jayawickreme, Emily Burdett, Mike Prentice, Patrick Dawson, Jessica Koehler, Michael J. Gross and Wendy Booth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Moral Education, Augustinian Studies, Journal of Religious Ethics, Deviant Behavior and Electoral Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact