Michael Jubien
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 9
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition 1
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
- Co-authors
- Scott A. Shalkowski (1 shared paper)Keith Campbell (1 shared paper)John Bigelow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Noûs (7 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Synthese (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Jubien
20 papers receiving 205 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- History and Philosophy of Science 103
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 173
- Theoretical Computer Science 14
- Philosophy 138
- General Psychology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Jubien
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Jubien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Jubien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Jubien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Jubien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Jubien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Jubien. The network helps show where Michael Jubien may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Michael Jubien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 58 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 13 | |
| 8 | Contemporary Metaphysics: An Introduction | 1997 | 7 |
| 9 | Review: Crispin Wright, Frege's Conception of Numbers as Objects | 1985 | 6 |
| 10 | 1972 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1969 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 1 |
About Michael Jubien
Michael Jubien is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (173 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations), Philosophy (138 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Michael Jubien has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott A. Shalkowski, Keith Campbell and John Bigelow. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, The Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.