Chris Daly
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
- Philosophy 15
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 9
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
- Journals
- Analysis (6 papers)Philosophical Studies (4 papers)The Monist (3 papers)Synthese (2 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Daly
26 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- History and Philosophy of Science 98
- Philosophy 118
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
- Theoretical Computer Science 5
- General Psychology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Daly
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Daly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Daly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Daly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Daly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Daly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Daly. The network helps show where Chris Daly may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Chris Daly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 2 |
About Chris Daly
Chris Daly is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 28 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (98 citations), Philosophy (118 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Chris Daly has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Liggins and S. C. Langford. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophical Studies, The Monist, Synthese and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.