Ignacio Angelelli

757 citations
22 papers · 207 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ignacio Angelelli

16 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Ignacio Angelelli
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Theoretical Computer Science 14
  • History and Philosophy of Science 55
  • Philosophy 94
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • General Social Sciences 5
Replace Rolf George with:
Rolf George Canada
Friedrich Waismann United Kingdom
Paul Cortois Belgium
Michael Jubien United States
Guy Stock United Kingdom
David Bostock United Kingdom
Guido Küng Switzerland
Gabriël Nuchelmans Netherlands
Michael B. Burke United States
Montgomery Furth United States
Ignacio Angelelli relative to Rolf George Canada Rolf George's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rolf George · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Angelelli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Angelelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Angelelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Angelelli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Angelelli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Angelelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Angelelli. The network helps show where Ignacio Angelelli may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ignacio Angelelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ignacio Angelelli Line = papers co-authored together Ignacio Angelelli links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198043
2 196728
3 199127
4
Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze
196426
5 196925
6 197018
7
Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the III. Symposium on the History of Logic
19967
8 19727
9 19887
10 19675
11 19784
12 19653
13 19852
14 19662
15 20121
16 19951
17 19831
18
Abstraction and number in Michael Dummett's Frege: Philosophy of mathematics
19940
19 20180
20 19830

About Ignacio Angelelli

Ignacio Angelelli is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (1 paper), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 paper), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper) and Neural Networks and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (14 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (55 citations), Philosophy (94 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and General Social Sciences (5 citations). Ignacio Angelelli has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gottlob Frege, Jorge J. E. Gracia, J. E. Llewelyn, Robert Stoothoff and Hans Sluga. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic, The Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly and Journal of the history of philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact