David Bostock

1.3k citations
35 papers · 303 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David Bostock

33 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

David Bostock
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Theoretical Computer Science 20
  • Philosophy 172
  • History and Philosophy of Science 60
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Anthropology 43
Replace Paul Vincent Spade with:
Paul Vincent Spade United States
Jan Pinborg Denmark
Gyula Klima United States
Alfred J. Freddoso United States
J. M. Bocheński United States
Susanne Bobzien United Kingdom
Norman Gulley United Kingdom
Ernest A. Moody United States
Jacques Brunschwig France
Robert Stoothoff United Kingdom
David Bostock relative to Paul Vincent Spade United States Paul Vincent Spade's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Paul Vincent Spade · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Bostock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Bostock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bostock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bostock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Bostock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bostock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bostock. The network helps show where David Bostock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Bostock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Bostock Line = papers co-authored together David Bostock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Plato's Phaedo
198649
2
Plato's Theaetetus
199134
3 200220
4 198818
5
Aristotle metaphysics, Books Z and H
199417
6 199714
7 200613
8 201213
9 198812
10 198112
11 197611
12 199011
13 19808
14 19976
15 19816
16
Plato on 'Is Not' (Sophist, 254-9)
19845
17 20095
18 19735
19 20065
20 19765

About David Bostock

David Bostock is a scholar working on Philosophy, Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (15 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (20 citations), Philosophy (172 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (60 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and Anthropology (43 citations). David Bostock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aristotle , Stanley C. Martens, Mary Tiles, Harold T. Hodes, Dana Scott, Susan Sauvé Meyer, Donald Morrison, Richard Kraut, Nicholas D. Smith and Thomas C. Brickhouse. Their work appears in journals such as Phronesis, The Philosophical Review, The Philosophical Quarterly, Mind and History and Philosophy of Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact