Thomas Ricketts
Impact in
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 2%
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 6
-
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
- Co-authors
- James Levine (1 shared paper)David Bloor (1 shared paper)Hans‐Johann Glock (1 shared paper)Cora Diamond (1 shared paper)Hans Sluga (1 shared paper)Steve Gerrard (1 shared paper)Donna M. Summerfield (1 shared paper)Naomi Scheman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Topics (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)Noûs (1 paper)Pacific philosophical quarterly (1 paper)The Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Ricketts
9 papers receiving 140 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- History and Philosophy of Science 76
- Philosophy 138
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 142
- Theoretical Computer Science 11
- Artificial Intelligence 27
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ricketts
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ricketts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ricketts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ricketts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ricketts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ricketts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ricketts. The network helps show where Thomas Ricketts may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ricketts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 96 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 |
About Thomas Ricketts
Thomas Ricketts is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 203 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper), Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (76 citations), Philosophy (138 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (27 citations). Thomas Ricketts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Levine, David Bloor, Hans‐Johann Glock, Cora Diamond, Hans Sluga, Steve Gerrard, Donna M. Summerfield, Naomi Scheman, Robert J. Fogelin and Michael Kober. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Topics, The Philosophical Review, Noûs, Pacific philosophical quarterly and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.