Michael Hein

12 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Michael Hein
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 219
  • Social Psychology 284
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • Communication 61
Replace George B. Forsythe with:
George B. Forsythe United States
Tracy D. Hecht Canada
T. O. Jacobs United States
Janelle A. Gilbert United States
Victoria L. Pace United States
William I. Sauser United States
Darin Wiechmann United States
Kevin Tasa Canada
Paul R. Yost United States
Michael Hein relative to George B. Forsythe United States George B. Forsythe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
George B. Forsythe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hein. The network helps show where Michael Hein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hein Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1991423
2 2008121
3 2001106
4 201616
5 202015
6 19978
7
Die Verbände der Sozialversicherungsträger in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
19906
8 19936
9
Improving Aviation Students’ Teamwork, Problem Solving, Coordination, and Communications Skills During a High-Fidelity Simulation
20173
10 20221
11 20241
12 19971

About Michael Hein

Michael Hein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Gender Studies, having authored 12 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Design Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (219 citations), Social Psychology (284 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations) and Communication (61 citations). Michael Hein has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Mumford, Edwin A. Fleishman, Arthur L. Korotkin, Kerry Levin, Stephen J. Zaccaro, Thomas M. Brinthaupt, Jack M. Feldman, Richard G. Moffett, Ben Stickle and Glenn E. Littlepage. Their work appears in journals such as Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, Journal of Personality, Policing An International Journal, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Journal of Personality Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact