Michael Detlefsen

1.2k citations
31 papers · 535 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Detlefsen

22 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Michael Detlefsen
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Theoretical Computer Science 78
  • History and Philosophy of Science 126
  • Philosophy 250
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 210
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 136
Replace Andrew Arana with:
Andrew Arana United States
Mark Balaguer United States
Neil Tennant United States
Gila Sher United States
Richard G. Heck United States
Jan Woleński Poland
Linda Wetzel United States
Jody Azzouni United States
Paul Benacerraf United States
Vann McGee United States
Michael Detlefsen relative to Andrew Arana United States Andrew Arana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrew Arana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Detlefsen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Detlefsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Detlefsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Detlefsen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Detlefsen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Detlefsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Detlefsen. The network helps show where Michael Detlefsen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michael Detlefsen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Detlefsen Line = papers co-authored together Michael Detlefsen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Purity of Methods
2011256
2 198035
3
Hilbert's program
198633
4 198632
5 199222
6 199120
7 197819
8 199615
9 198813
10 199013
11 199013
12 197610
13 19749
14 19798
15 20018
16
Hilbert's formalism
19936
17 19936
18 19955
19 19994
20 19933

About Michael Detlefsen

Michael Detlefsen is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Theoretical Computer Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Geometry and Topology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (6 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (3 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (78 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (126 citations), Philosophy (250 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (210 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (136 citations). Michael Detlefsen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Arana, Mark Steiner, Charles M. Young, John Bacon, Andrzej Szymański and Loren Ε. Lomasky. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Mathematica, Journal of Philosophical Logic, The Journal of Philosophy, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and The Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact