John Bacon

514 citations
33 papers · 303 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Bacon

27 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

John Bacon
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
  • Philosophy 158
  • History and Philosophy of Science 65
  • Language and Linguistics 39
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
Replace Joseph L. Camp with:
Joseph L. Camp United States
David Lewis United States
Anthony Everett United States
E. Jonathan Lowe United Kingdom
David H. Sanford United States
Thomas J. McKay United States
Mark Sainsbury United States
Richard Sharvy United States
John Oliver Perry
Josh Parsons United Kingdom
John Bacon relative to Joseph L. Camp United States Joseph L. Camp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Joseph L. Camp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bacon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bacon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bacon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bacon. The network helps show where John Bacon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside John Bacon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bacon Line = papers co-authored together John Bacon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D M Armstrong
199365
2
Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays on the Philosophy of D. M. Armstrong
199356
3 199650
4 200035
5 198618
6 198013
7 198513
8 19739
9 19885
10 19714
11 19954
12 19793
13 19863
14 19893
15 19652
16 19672
17 19692
18 19752
19 19782
20
Logic from A to Z: The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Glossary of Logical and Mathematical Terms
19992

About John Bacon

John Bacon is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (14 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations), Philosophy (158 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (65 citations), Language and Linguistics (39 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). John Bacon has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Lloyd Reinhardt, Keith Campbell, James Van Cleve and Michael E. Detlefsen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Philosophical Studies, Synthese and The Monist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact