Mark Steiner

28 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

Mark Steiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Theoretical Computer Science 131
  • History and Philosophy of Science 414
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 263
  • Philosophy 175
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 94
Replace Mathieu Marion with:
Mathieu Marion Canada
Ronald W. Clark United States
Décio Krause Brazil
Frank Arntzenius United States
Miklós Rédei Hungary
Øystein Linnebo Norway
Frederik Müller Netherlands
María Carla Galavotti Italy
Paolo Mancosu United States
Leo Corry Israel
Mark Steiner relative to Mathieu Marion Canada Mathieu Marion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Mathieu Marion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Steiner. The network helps show where Mark Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Steiner Line = papers co-authored together Mark Steiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998187
2 1978186
3 1968158
4 197870
5 200053
6 200049
7 198944
8 199941
9 196940
10 199235
11 197326
12 198324
13 199124
14 199523
15 199620
16 200912
17 201111
18 199611
19 19759
20 19867

About Mark Steiner

Mark Steiner is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (131 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (414 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (263 citations), Philosophy (175 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (94 citations). Mark Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gray Sj, Michael Detlefsen, Melba Hernandez, Dooseop Kim, Carl P. Sparrow, Samuel D. Wright, Patricia A. Detmers, Arthur A. Patchett, Yu‐Sheng Chao and Meng‐Hsin Chen. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact