Loren Ε. Lomasky

1.6k citations
49 papers · 478 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Loren Ε. Lomasky

40 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Loren Ε. Lomasky
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Political Science and International Relations 245
  • Philosophy 87
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Law 55
  • Safety Research 44
Replace Ben Saunders with:
Ben Saunders United Kingdom
T. D. Campbell United Kingdom
Peter de Marneffe United States
Steven Wall United States
Kent Greenawalt United States
Serena Olsaretti Spain
William J. Stuntz United States
Kevin Vallier United States
Paul Weithman United States
Andreas T. Schmidt Netherlands
Loren Ε. Lomasky relative to Ben Saunders United Kingdom Ben Saunders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ben Saunders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Loren Ε. Lomasky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loren Ε. Lomasky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loren Ε. Lomasky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loren Ε. Lomasky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Loren Ε. Lomasky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loren Ε. Lomasky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loren Ε. Lomasky. The network helps show where Loren Ε. Lomasky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Loren Ε. Lomasky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Loren Ε. Lomasky Line = papers co-authored together Loren Ε. Lomasky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199090
2 198547
3 200046
4 200632
5
Autonomy and Automobility
199726
6 200519
7 201318
8 198418
9 200517
10 199016
11 198215
12
Politics and Process : New Essays in Democratic Thought
198915
13 199014
14 200610
15 19898
16 19848
17 20158
18 19907
19 19846
20 20085

About Loren Ε. Lomasky

Loren Ε. Lomasky is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 49 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (15 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (3 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (245 citations), Philosophy (87 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations), Law (55 citations) and Safety Research (44 citations). Loren Ε. Lomasky has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Brennan, H. Geoffrey Brennan, Elizabeth Fenton, Jeffrey Paul, Gerald Gaus, Fernando R. Tesón, Andrew Levine, James M. Buchanan, Michael Detlefsen and John S. Dryzek. Their work appears in journals such as Social Philosophy and Policy, The Hastings Center Report, Public Choice, The Philosophical Quarterly and The Monist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact