Michael D. Chao

406 citations
48 papers · 283 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. Chao

42 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Michael D. Chao
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Animal Science and Zoology 212
  • Food Science 103
  • Insect Science 30
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 36
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 15
Replace M.R. Hunt with:
M.R. Hunt United States
C.H. Corbin United States
Lu Dou China
Robledo de Almeida Torres Filho Brazil
G. Beretta Italy
Kirsten Pfeiffer United States
Michael J. Colle United States
Tomasz Lesiów Poland
V. Dorigoni Italy
Verónica Alonso Spain
Michael D. Chao relative to M.R. Hunt United States M.R. Hunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
M.R. Hunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Chao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Chao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Chao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Chao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Chao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Chao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Chao. The network helps show where Michael D. Chao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Chao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Chao Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Chao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202158
2 202021
3 201917
4 202115
5 201914
6 202210
7 201710
8 20229
9 20209
10
Feeding Vitamin E May Reverse Sarcoplasmic\nReticulum Membrane Instability Caused by Feeding\nWet Distillers Grains Plus Solubles to Cattle
20168
11 20237
12 20177
13 20177
14 20207
15 20227
16 20226
17 20216
18 20216
19 20216
20
IMPACT OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS PLUS SOLUBLES AND ANTIOXIDANTS ON A BASIC MECHANISM OF BEEF TENDERIZATION
20156

About Michael D. Chao

Michael D. Chao is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (38 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (19 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (12 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (212 citations), Food Science (103 citations), Insect Science (30 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (36 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (15 citations). Michael D. Chao has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include T. G. O’Quinn, Chris R. Calkins, Zhenjiao Du, Yanting Shen, Yonghui Li, Shan Hong, Jessie Vipham, Géraldine Magnin, J. M. Gonzalez and Wei‐Wen Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Animal Production Science, Journal of Animal Science, Frontiers in Physiology and LWT.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact