Michael Clancy

1.7k citations
50 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Clancy

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Computer Science Applications 965
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 519
  • Software 143
  • Media Technology 154
  • Information Systems 284
Replace Michelle Craig with:
Michelle Craig Canada
Carol Zander United States
Susan Bergin Ireland
Carol Miller United States
Wallace Feurzeig United States
Javier Torrente Spain
Maria Cutumisu Canada
Michael Eagle United States
I‐Han Hsiao United States
Theo J. H. M. Eggen Netherlands
Michael Clancy relative to Michelle Craig Canada Michelle Craig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michelle Craig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Clancy. The network helps show where Michael Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Clancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Clancy Line = papers co-authored together Michael Clancy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992242
2 2014102
3 200190
4 199980
5 200868
6 198859
7 199957
8 201054
9 201953
10
Designing Pascal Solutions: A Case Study Approach
199252
11 199548
12 201245
13 199242
14 200334
15 201833
16 199332
17 201830
18 199223
19 198720
20 202014

About Michael Clancy

Michael Clancy is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Media Technology, Artificial Intelligence and Education, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (31 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (10 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (8 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers) and Software Engineering Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (965 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (519 citations), Software (143 citations), Media Technology (154 citations) and Information Systems (284 citations). Michael Clancy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marcia C. Linn, Leo Porter, Kevin C. Webb, Daniel Zingaro, Cynthia Taylor, Colleen M. Lewis, Cynthia Lee, Elizabeth A. Davis, Chaewon Lee and Curtis Hardyck. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, Computer Science Education, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Interactive Learning Environments and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact