Michael Clancy

1.7k citations
49 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Clancy

48 papers receiving 942 citations

Peers

Michael Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Computer Science Applications 718
  • Software 133
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 375
  • Media Technology 136
  • Information Systems 236
Replace Maria Cutumisu with:
Maria Cutumisu Canada
Carol Miller United States
Javier Torrente Spain
Aldo Gordillo Spain
Liz Bacon United Kingdom
Markus Hohenwarter Austria
G. Gage Kingsbury United States
Michael Eagle United States
Wendy McCracken United Kingdom
I‐Han Hsiao United States
Michael Clancy relative to Maria Cutumisu Canada Maria Cutumisu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Maria Cutumisu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Clancy. The network helps show where Michael Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Clancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Clancy Line = papers co-authored together Michael Clancy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992188
2 200188
3 201469
4 199968
5 198859
6 200858
7 201950
8 199237
9 200333
10 199330
11 201830
12 201828
13 199223
14 201020
15
Designing Pascal Solutions: A Case Study Approach
199219
16 199918
17 198718
18 199516
19 199213
20 202013

About Michael Clancy

Michael Clancy is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Media Technology, Artificial Intelligence and Education, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (30 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (10 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (10 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (9 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers) and Software Engineering Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (718 citations), Software (133 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (375 citations), Media Technology (136 citations) and Information Systems (236 citations). Michael Clancy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marcia C. Linn, Daniel Zingaro, Leo Porter, Kevin C. Webb, Cynthia Taylor, Cynthia Lee, Curtis Hardyck, Soohyun Nam Liao, Chaewon Lee and Colleen M. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, Computer Science Education, Interactive Learning Environments, Journal of Educational Computing Research and Communications of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact