Max Deutsch

986 citations
23 papers · 513 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Max Deutsch

21 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Max Deutsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Philosophy 383
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 240
  • History and Philosophy of Science 83
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 258
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace John Bengson with:
John Bengson United States
Elijah Chudnoff United States
Carlotta Pavese United States
Nat Hansen United Kingdom
Danièle Moyal‐Sharrock United Kingdom
Anandi Hattiangadi Sweden
Jennifer Nado Hong Kong
Brie Gertler United States
Declan Smithies United States
Joseph Ulatowski New Zealand
Max Deutsch relative to John Bengson United States John Bengson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
John Bengson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Deutsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Deutsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Deutsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Deutsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Deutsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Deutsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Deutsch. The network helps show where Max Deutsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Max Deutsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Deutsch Line = papers co-authored together Max Deutsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015104
2 200991
3 201083
4 202056
5 201555
6
Externalism About Mental Content
200228
7
The Myth of the Intuitive: Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method
201525
8 202114
9 202012
10
The use of contingent music to increase appropriate conversational speech.
197811
11 20208
12 20167
13 20056
14 20213
15 20202
16 20152
17 20251
18 20161
19
The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy
20181
20 20191

About Max Deutsch

Max Deutsch is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (383 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (240 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (83 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (258 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Max Deutsch has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Norway and Mongolia. Frequent co-authors include Édouard Machery, Justin Sytsma, Herman Cappelen, Michael K. Johnson and Mark Rowlands. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Analysis and Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact