Mongolia

12.7k papers and 156.9k indexed citations

About

In recent decades scholars affiliated with institutions in Mongolia have published 12.7k papers, which have received a total of 156.9k indexed citations. Scholars in Mongolia publish mostly in Molecular Biology (944 papers), Epidemiology (849 papers) and Ecology (787 papers) and are cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (16.9k citations), Molecular Biology (14.6k citations) and Geophysics (13.8k citations). Scholars in Mongolia collaborate with scholars from China, United States and Japan. Scholars in Mongolia have published in prestigous journals including Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mongolia

3.4k papers receiving 23.3k citations

Fields of papers citing works of authors working in Mongolia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by authors working at institutions in Mongolia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by authors working at institutions in Mongolia. The network helps show where authors in Mongolia may publish in the future.

Countries collaborating with authors based in Mongolia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by institutions in Mongolia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers from institutions in Mongolia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mongolia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

You can explore the trade impact of Mongolia, by visiting their OEC page.

Explore countries with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026