John Bengson

1.1k citations
23 papers · 602 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Bengson

22 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

John Bengson
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Philosophy 470
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 309
  • History and Philosophy of Science 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 268
  • Family Practice 9
Replace Selim Berker with:
Selim Berker United States
Michael R. DePaul United States
Allan Hazlett United States
Kieran Setiya United States
Paulina Sliwa United Kingdom
Jane Friedman United States
Matthew Chrisman United Kingdom
Elijah Chudnoff United States
Jonathan Livengood United States
Wayne D. Riggs United States
John Bengson relative to Selim Berker United States Selim Berker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Selim Berker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bengson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bengson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bengson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bengson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bengson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bengson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bengson. The network helps show where John Bengson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Bengson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bengson Line = papers co-authored together John Bengson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015101
2 201276
3 200772
4 201258
5 200853
6 200940
7 201440
8 201235
9 201029
10 201222
11 201520
12 20229
13 20169
14 20159
15 20137
16 20197
17 20196
18 20234
19 20222
20 20241

About John Bengson

John Bengson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Social Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (1 paper) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (470 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (309 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (268 citations) and Family Practice (9 citations). John Bengson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc A. Moffett, Jennifer Cole Wright, Terence Cuneo, Daniel Z. Korman and Russ Shafer‐Landau. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Noûs, Mind, Mind & Language and Philosophical Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact