John Bengson
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 17
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 17
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
- Co-authors
- Marc A. Moffett (5 shared papers)Jennifer Cole Wright (2 shared papers)Russ Shafer‐Landau (7 shared papers)Terence D. Cuneo (8 shared papers)Daniel Z. Korman (1 shared paper)Andrew E. Reisner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Noûs (3 papers)Mind (2 papers)Inquiry (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
John Bengson
22 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Philosophy 474
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 310
- History and Philosophy of Science 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 270
- Family Practice 10
Countries citing papers authored by John Bengson
This map shows the geographic impact of John Bengson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bengson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bengson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Bengson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bengson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bengson. The network helps show where John Bengson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Bengson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2 |
About John Bengson
John Bengson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (474 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (310 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (270 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). John Bengson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Marc A. Moffett, Jennifer Cole Wright, Russ Shafer‐Landau, Terence D. Cuneo, Daniel Z. Korman and Andrew E. Reisner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Noûs, Mind, Inquiry and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.