Declan Smithies

1.8k citations
39 papers · 844 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Declan Smithies

34 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

Declan Smithies
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Philosophy 702
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 505
  • History and Philosophy of Science 142
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 404
  • General Decision Sciences 11
Replace Ram Neta with:
Ram Neta United States
Elijah Chudnoff United States
Paul Snowdon United Kingdom
John Bengson United States
Max Deutsch Hong Kong
Jane Friedman United States
Annalisa Coliva United States
Juan Comesaña United States
Jesper Kallestrup United Kingdom
Paul Noordhof United Kingdom
Declan Smithies relative to Ram Neta United States Ram Neta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ram Neta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Declan Smithies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Declan Smithies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Declan Smithies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Declan Smithies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Declan Smithies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Declan Smithies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Declan Smithies. The network helps show where Declan Smithies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Declan Smithies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Declan Smithies Line = papers co-authored together Declan Smithies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011115
2 201197
3 201986
4 201284
5 201579
6 201145
7 201340
8 201136
9 201435
10 201125
11 201224
12 201223
13
Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic
200721
14 201917
15 201514
16 201612
17 201311
18 201510
19 201310
20 20129

About Declan Smithies

Declan Smithies is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (32 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (702 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (505 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (142 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (404 citations) and General Decision Sciences (11 citations). Declan Smithies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Stoljar, Richard J. Samuels, John Hawthorne, Geoffrey Lee, Stewart Cohen, Ralph Wedgwood, Timothy Williamson, Louis deRosset, Brian Weatherson and R. N. Boyd. Their work appears in journals such as Analytic Philosophy, Synthese, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Studies and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact