Máté Tóth

2k citations
35 papers · 1.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Máté Tóth

33 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Máté Tóth
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 352
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 601
  • Social Psychology 477
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 385
  • Clinical Psychology 334
Replace John P. Christianson with:
John P. Christianson United States
József Halász Hungary
Frans Sluyter Netherlands
Gerd Poeggel Germany
Jodi L. Lukkes United States
Éva Mikics Hungary
Todd H. Ahern United States
Daniela Rüedi‐Bettschen United States
Ada C. Felix‐Ortiz United States
Holger D. Russig Switzerland
Máté Tóth relative to John P. Christianson United States John P. Christianson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
John P. Christianson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Máté Tóth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Máté Tóth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Máté Tóth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Máté Tóth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Máté Tóth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Máté Tóth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Máté Tóth. The network helps show where Máté Tóth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Máté Tóth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Máté Tóth Line = papers co-authored together Máté Tóth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017213
2 2006124
3 2011122
4 2008107
5 201787
6 200574
7 201267
8 200666
9 201059
10 201253
11 201853
12 201752
13 201050
14 201646
15 200542
16 200836
17 201532
18 200931
19 201530
20 200729

About Máté Tóth

Máté Tóth is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (15 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (10 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (9 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (352 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (601 citations), Social Psychology (477 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (385 citations) and Clinical Psychology (334 citations). Máté Tóth has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include József Haller, József Halász, Éva Mikics, Áron Tulogdi, Victoria B. Risbrough, Jessica Deslauriers, László Bíró, Andre Der‐Avakian, Elizabeth I. Flandreau and József Haller. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Neuropsychopharmacology, Physiology & Behavior, Neurobiology of Stress and Behavioural Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact