Neurobiology of Stress

619 papers and 15.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 619 papers published in Neurobiology of Stress in the last decades have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurobiology of Stress usually cover Behavioral Neuroscience (391 papers), Social Psychology (193 papers) and Biological Psychiatry (165 papers) specifically the topics of Stress Responses and Cortisol (391 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (183 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (165 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurobiology of Stress are Paul Willner, John F. Cryan, Linda Rinaman, Jane A. Foster, Marta Weinstock, Timothy G. Dinan, Nicholas J. Justice, Rebecca M. Shansky, Scott J. Russo and Daniela Kaufer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurobiology of Stress

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurobiology of Stress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurobiology of Stress.

Countries where authors publish in Neurobiology of Stress

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurobiology of Stress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurobiology of Stress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurobiology of Stress more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025