Marlene Pinto
Impact in
- Food Science top 5%
- Food Drying and Modeling
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 17
- Food Science 16
- Food Drying and Modeling 5
- Proteins in Food Systems 5
- Co-authors
- Sergio Almonacid (27 shared papers)Pedro L. Valencia (20 shared papers)Cristián Ramírez (19 shared papers)Ricardo Simpson (10 shared papers)Helena Núñez (10 shared papers)Ricardo J. Simpson (4 shared papers)Alonso V. Jaques (4 shared papers)Constanza Cárdenas (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Foods (9 papers)Process Biochemistry (3 papers)Food and Bioproducts Processing (3 papers)LWT (3 papers)Journal of Food Engineering (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChileColombiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Marlene Pinto
35 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Food Science 277
- Animal Science and Zoology 144
- Aquatic Science 77
- Biotechnology 53
- Insect Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Marlene Pinto
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene Pinto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene Pinto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene Pinto. The network helps show where Marlene Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marlene Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 10 |
About Marlene Pinto
Marlene Pinto is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Aquatic Science, Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (17 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (14 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (9 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (5 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (5 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (5 papers), Freezing and Crystallization Processes (4 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (277 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (144 citations), Aquatic Science (77 citations), Biotechnology (53 citations) and Insect Science (56 citations). Marlene Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Colombia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sergio Almonacid, Pedro L. Valencia, Cristián Ramírez, Ricardo Simpson, Helena Núñez, Ricardo J. Simpson, Alonso V. Jaques, Constanza Cárdenas, Lida Fuentes and Oscar Vega‐Castro. Their work appears in journals such as Foods, Process Biochemistry, Food and Bioproducts Processing, LWT and Journal of Food Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.